Argumentative Essay On Pornography - 1871 Words

ntroduction Throughout the long history of pornography there has been an ongoing debate as to whether pornography is something that should be accepted in society or condemned as immoral. The way pornography is often viewed by individuals is either from an anti or pro-porn perspective. This essay will discuss why pornography is seen in such a black and white manner and also aims to present reasons why it should not be. It will discuss how the ‘grey’ areas around the porn industry, freedom of speech and consumerism in today’s society have together made the way porn is viewed and created, and how this has affected certain parts of society. Five topics surrounding pornography– ‘pornification’, production and consumption, discourses of†¦show more content†¦Another explanation is that they are someone who does not see the worth in paying for pornography when there is plenty to be found for free. The main reasons for paying for porn ography online would be to access something specific or to purposefully support a pornstar or producer. This poses the question, would more people be prepared to pay if free porn was harder to access? Even so, with the porn industry missing out on paying consumers due to the availability of free porn online, it has still managed to keep afloat, though how well it has is unknown. The actual size of the industry is still largely disputed, mainly because statisticians can not agree as to what products should constitute as porn (Slade 1093), though a 1995 Times article â€Å"liberally categorised 83.5 percent of all photographs online as pornographic† (Paasonen 166). In many reports written on pornography there is a different definition of pornography and erotica. Diana Russell sums it up as â€Å"feminists of the anti-pornography-equals-censorship school deliberately obfuscate any distinction between erotica and pornography, using the term erotica for all sexually exp licit materials. In contrast, anti-pornography feminists consider it vitally important to distinguish between pornography and erotica† (2). She then goes on to give her definitions of pornography, which includes â€Å"abuse or degradation that appears to endorse, condone, or encourage such behaviour† and erotica,Show MoreRelatedArgumentative Essay : First Amendment Junkie By Susan Jacoby1042 Words   |  5 PagesAmber Rogers Dr. Kim Loel Argumentative Analysis of the Essay â€Å"First Amendment Junkie† by Susan Jacoby What is a First Amendment Junkie? According to author Susan Jacoby, censorship of any form is wrong. From the beginning of Jacoby’s essay, â€Å"First Amendment Junkie,† it’s obvious where she stands on the topic. Jacoby states that the people who most support the censorship of pornography are women. These women are often self-proclaimed feminists who ironically support the First Amendment. WhileRead MoreContemporary Moral Issue Essay2709 Words   |  11 Pages philosophical essays, and book excerpts, all of which will be posted on Blackboard (http://blackboard.wm.edu). Goals of the Course: By taking Contemporary Moral Issues, students will: learn how to read difficult philosophical texts and gain an understanding and appreciation of important arguments in the field; learn how to express their thoughts in writing clearly and concisely (students will have the opportunity to attain this goal through response papers, quizzes and essays); learn how toRead MoreEssay about Rogerian Arguments2562 Words   |  11 Pagesof a divisive issue. You might write an argument against the death penalty, or for or against censorship of pornography. But argument has another meaning, too. It means an essay that, simply, argues a point. You might assemble an argument about the significance of ancestor myths in a certain aborigine culture, or you might write an argument defending your understanding of any poem or essay that is read in your philosophy class. (Winthrop University) You are not necessarily taking one side of a divisiveRead MorePublic Criminology Essay3270 Words   |  14 Pageslevel, as discovered through this essay. It doesn’t just include lab work, research and discoveries, it involves community based teaching in a way that the public can be informed and educated through upfront communication. Throughout this essay, the broad definition of public criminology will be discussed as well as its relevance to society. As with anything, there are challenges and promises that accompany public criminology and those will be stated in this essay. Examples will be given to help youRead MoreNegative Influence of Virtual Reality3058 Words   |  13 Pages(1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication. 42(2). Reflective Writing During the second semester we have been given a task to produce an argumentative essay on one of the given topics. The first step that I had to take was choosing the topic of my essay. To tell honestly this took rather a long time, as I was interested in totally different spheres such as Law and Information Technology. However my final choice was Virtual Reality. VirtualRead MoreFor Against by L.G. Alexander31987 Words   |  128 PagesBy the same author SIXTY STEPS TO PRECIS POETRY AND PROSE APPRECIATION ESSAY AND LEITER ·WRITING A FIRST BOOK IN COMPREHENSION PRECIS AND COMPOSITION ras CARTERS OF GREENWOOD (Cineloops) DETECTIVES FROM SCOTLAND YARD (Longman Structural Readers, Stage 1) CAR THIEVES [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 1) WORTH A FORTUNE [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) APRIL FOOLS DAY [Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) PROFESSOR BOFFIN S UMBRELLA (Longman Structural Readers, Stage 2) OPERATION MASfERMINDRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pageswere the most motivated and did best when their leader expressed anger. Why do disagreeable teams do their best when their leader is angry? If you recall our discussion of agreeableness in Chapter 5, disagreeable individuals are more direct, more argumentative, and less conflict-averse than their more agreeable counterparts. Disagreeable teams may react better to an angry leader because the leader is speaking a language the team can understand, or the disagreeable team members may be less sensitive to